Considering how long you've been on this website, I'm sure that you're aware the pages are to be presented in a factual based narrative. Your recent addition to the Goatman page does not follow that format. The information you derived from Gunshow's "Goatman Debunked" thread is unsubstantiated and simply lacks validity. The "Pope Lick Monster" photo is not universally accepted amongst the myth hunting community as the source image, and the static noise argument was disproven by me. 
I have a feeling that it was Gunshow who put you up to this, because I wouldn't expect such disinformation coming from you. If I'm right, I'd like for you to tell me so I can repeat this information to him.
I was thinking, that new update in GTA:O would solve quite alot of mysteries around the game. Considered it has be "proven" the update was made from elements for a plausible solo DLC (Triggers and names such as Clifford found as early as 2015 in the game's files), would it be safe to use said dlc to explain them ? I'm thinking about chilliad fresque, the chilliad tunnel mysteries and hatch, the agents near IAA satdish and such
TheIndependent40 wrote: Well, IMO it would be good to use the DLC to explain them, but every human has different point of view. I think a CNb request could do that, because community can decide. Tho it's nice you asked ;)