AwesomeBoy and Myth hunter have made a wiki called the GTA 3 Wiki. On it, they have stolen info from our wiki and the GTA Wiki. If you go on their navigation, cycle across to Easter Eggs and Myths and look at their pages. They are almost identical.
Hey all, I have freshly joined this wiki and took a look and a number of tremendous and mind bongling posts . All of them being commented and discussed by everone . Except a ufo related myth post thats seems to me to be really important and that could end the question of ufo's in vice city that still preoccupy us .
I just want to ask you why you think it is possible for bigfoot to exist in GTA SA, I want proof. If you don't have proof, it can't be "POSSIBLE", no matter how much power on this Wiki you have. Also, why did you remove the added section in the infobox? It's useful.
First off I don't start getting all aggressive on me. Bigfoot is a possibility as there are various rumors and reported sightings from numerous sources dating back to the games' release. What makes you so sure Bigfoot is not in the game? Do you work at R*? This wiki doesn't just have proven or false myths. If you read the main page you would know that.
The infobox is only for staff to edit. The section you added was pretty worthless and unneeded so I removed it.
Sasquatch101 wrote: Bigfoot is a possibility as there are various rumors and reported sightings from numerous sources dating back to the games' release. What makes you so sure Bigfoot is not in the game? Do you work at R*?
You don't have to be a Rockstar employee to know that it's not possible for him to be in the game. There are NO textures or ANY files to support the fact that it's possible. THAT fact right there is more factual than a lot of people claiming they something that doesn't exist. I came on here thinking it was a Wiki, but it isn't. It's a speculation site. This Wiki is supposed to have factual information about the myths and legends of GTA, not a bunch of conspiracy theorists trying to get attention from photoshopped images and badly drawn red circles.
Hey sasquach i saw that existence if aliens and ufos is proven. But there is proof of aliens as various references but no proof to exist in physical form.
I think its existence should be:
Unknown(in physical form)
Hey prior to RageQuit's banning, I discussed with him some notes on how to go about with dealing with characters from other franchises physically appearing in GTA. I decided to just leave the link to the discussion above so I don't have to type up the whole thing over completely. Basically, characters like Squidward (Nickelodeon), Ring girl, Jason (Friday the 13th), and Nemesis (Capcom) can be ruled as False since there's no way that Rockstar would go out of their way to put a character owned by a different rights holder in their game and hand away thousands of dollars in royalty fees just for an easter egg. By some chance they put it characters in the game, they would have seen lawsuits left and right. Had they existed in the game, news articles would have popped up by now and it would be common knowledge. Things like Piggsy and Bigfoot however, are free for them to use since Rockstar owns Manhunt and Bigfoot is public domain. (and I ended up rehashing my entire explanation unintentionally lol ) Just felt like giving a little penny for your thoughts :) I think I could probably do well as staff since I like to look at every angle of a theory or existing myth before jumping to conclusions. If I wasn't so busy, I would have applied ages ago. I'm finishing college in the Spring of 2015 so I'll have more time to actually contribute. Also, sorry again for my rage over Yankton thing. Like I said, I like to think of deeply analyze theories before ruling them as page worthy or deserve even being ruled as Possible. The Yankton thing was just the thing that broke the camels back for my resolve. Anywho, I know I typed up more than a paragraph already but if you do happen to read all this, kudos to you :)
That's a very valid point. Copyrighted characters in GTA games is highly unlikely, and that's why most myths that originated from popular culture and other media outside R* are generally considered to be false. Whenever you get some free time I encourage you to apply for staff as you are a long time editor and a very reliable resource for myths.
Thanks for hearing me out. Is there like an application? Also, any links I can follow to see some guidelines? Just so I don't encroach on any decrees or something like that.
But yeah, with exploring I go for obvious. Like I don't pull at vague references and try to push that a myth is real. I look at every possible aspect to debunk something before jumping to some conclusion like creatures that were only seen by one guy and the picture provided being a blurry cell phone shot instead of a clean clear image on Snapmatic. Also, they added a new control to GTAV so you can whip out the camera instantly. Double-tap the up arrow.
I think lots of myths are spurred from fans that just read into things too much. Just because there is a strange looking tree or an abandon house doesn't always mean there's a ghost or ghoul is there. Myth Hunters tend to get carried away sometimes but I'm always open investigate and discover the truth.
That's true. It's pretty much how the show Ancient Aliens became a thing. As for stuff like the golden tree, that's a texture glitch. There's plenty of plants in GTA V that glow at nice because they probably overlooked some foliage when they were adding shaders for the night. There's a bunch of bushes just like the tree in the Senora Desert. I'll try to look into the link this weekend.
Like you could at least understand where I'm coming from when I lash out over some myths right? We have an article for The Rake that isn't even snapmatic and Squidward's Suicide on the wiki since the whole Yankton incident. I just find myself taking a leave of absence or a breather from the wiki whenever stuff like this manages to get pages dedicated to them even though they're probably the product of some underage kid that believed everything they saw on the internet and thought they had to spread the news like Dib in Invader Zim. This clip is pretty much me whenever I see pages that shouldn't exist. I mean the 'no sherlocking' rule is a step in the right direction.
A new page came up called, Humane Labs Zombie Conspiracy.. I think that article can be deleted. It's more of a topic for discussion in the message board/forum since its still just a theory based on two preexisting pages. Also, is there a page for exploding vehicles yet? There's a new article called Spontaneous Glitch Combustion (which should be renamed Exploding Vehicles). It's basically a page made by someone still unfamiliar with the GTA Online vehicle spawning glitch; the one where two vehicles exploding for spawning together at the same place and time. Just wanted to give you a heads up since I just saw that RageQuit was banned. Anywho, look into those pages when you get a chance.