Dude at first, I would like to say that this is not revenge demotion. Let's get to the point. LSVault has been very inactive. I have been noticing that when I was in Liberty Wiki. In October and November, he didn't do any edits on this wiki. Well, except for 1 edit. He did only 1 edit in October 3. And after that, POOF! He vanished. Again, I repeat. This is not revenge demotion. But, I think you should do something. If we cut that 1 edit from October, he has been inactive for 2 months. Go to this for proof. So that means, Mashi was also inative closely for 2 months. But LSVault is now really inactive for 2 months. So, if I am not wrong, you think should demote LSVault ike you did with Mashi. Because both of them have been inactive for 2 months. Again, this is not revenge demotion.
Vaultboy has been not very active as of lately, however if you look at his edits in the month of September you'll see he made over 50 edits. Everyone takes a little break now and then from the wiki. Plus with Thanksgiving and Christmas people go on vacation and are preoccupied with other activities.
A couple of days ago, Neus Light (someone who is taking an incident on a wiki too far with me) emailed me stating that he wants to practice "breaking through". I have no idea what this means, but it's likely he is targeting a wiki and asking me to hack it. Here is the email in full:
"DargonKing, you and me are both pissed at Psychobilly for banning us from the wiki and I think we should try and practice "breaking through". I have files and a lot of things that would help attract the attention of that bitch and her idiot monkeys. Your friend in college can still help from his computer so call him after you finish this email. This wiki is really inactive and has some of the stupidest fucking admins I've seen in a lot of time. Tell me when you want to do this."
I don't know what this means, but of what I have seen over the last week, I've only seen me and Myth hunter active and editing pages. He also said something about "the stupidest fucking admins" which he may also refer to Myth hunter because he came across our chat on Monday.
Whatever I said to Neus was a lie to make him go away, leave the wiki alone and just bugger off. I don't know what he's planning to do, but what I have done is emailed him saying that I want to know the name of the wiki he plans to attack. If it's this one or one under any of the admins control, I will notify them. I would advise you reply quickly, because he can type very fast.
Hey sasquatch101, I`ve created the 3 strikers system to prevent MOD`s and fake pages..
Here take a look:
The 3 strikers Law on GTA-Myth-Wiki
The world is facing a threat that should not be allowed, it ruins this WIKIA... We`re talking about the Unreal facts and the Fake pictures... I have figured out a system, that may seem unfair, but it has to be done.
What do new people that has never been on this wikia want? If they want to find out about myths, they want: Reliable Facts! They need to know that this WIKIA takes myth hunting serious, and that we, the community, has real pictures and evidence.
1.If a user fakes a picture, or make pages of a unproven things, they will get One Strike!
2.If the user gets 3 strikes in their time on this WIKIA, they will be banned for a month.
3.When they come back after a month, they have 3 months to not do it again.
4.If the players does it one more time within the 3 months they will get banned and reported from this WIKIA.
5.If the user gets 3 strikes, and gets banned for a month, they also get a prick.
6.If the user gets 3 pricks what resembles (9) fake pictures or pages, they will also be banned from this WIKIA and reported.
7.We also have to remove unreal sites, of things that have no evidence, and evidence does not count as a sound or thing an user saw, no, they need more evidence to back it up.
8.If a user wants to talk about Myths they want to figure out, they can use the Forums!
This is just a Demo version, so it has to be "renovated"...
Me and Ghost Leader, and Myth hunter, has some ideas of removing pages that are only proven by mods.
Sorry for getting back to you late. This proposed system seem very harsh and could lead to disgruntled users attacking the wiki in retaliation. I've dealt with serious troll attacks because they felt too many rules are imposed on this wiki. So they tried to get me and the staff banned through wikia by making up complete lies and nonsense. Finally wikia banned all of these vandals who turned out to be part of a hate group. In the end we are just here to enjoy Myths and discover the truth about them. That's why we have a False myths category.
Then why don't we put Squidwards Suicide or Michael Myers in that category? And infact, the system usent harsh, we could get more users doing this, it also lears modders and people that just creates nonsense a lession, I and Ghost Leader think this is a good idea, but you can atleast think about it as an back up the day this WIKI gets flooded with unreal facts and mods...
Why did you remove the reply? Anyways... I have seen it, but I don`t like people adding in stuff like this on the sites of proven myths and not if they create a page about for example (Not in game Just found up by me right now) A spaggethi monster! If someone saw a spaggethi monster and added it in the proven myths category, it would not be a truthfull wiki that people could trust giving them facts.
I know, a spaggethi monster was a bad thing to say in talking about this, but your understand what I mean...