Fandom

GTA Myths Wiki

GTA Myths Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archive 8

< GTA Myths Wiki:Requests for Promotion

926pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk0

Death002 - Administrator

Closed as successful by LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 10:30, April 30, 2016 (UTC)

I think that all of you know me, I'm being rollback for a nearly 5 months now, and I was never blocked and I meet all requirements for administrator (I have 750 edits, I'm active for more than 2 months and I have rollback abilities). Since I got promoted to rollback, I had a new goal, that was to become administrator. Only your vote will decide.... Deaтh002 (talk) 19:55, April 22, 2016 (UTC)

Votes

Comments

  • You've been here since last year, and proved yourself to be a fine contributor, you're one of the few users on the wiki equipped with a clean (no block) record, which further supports that you're patient and suitable for tough situations. Good luck. --Ghost pixel 1 by zombiepattyfag-d9c9wvwAli Rocky: VC Myth Hunter 20:09, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
  • I say yes, make sure you don't do anything wrong when you become an administrator, so good luck.--User:Taskforce141yuri (talk) 02:40, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • No reason to say no.--007MH MythHunter 007 Talk 007MH 03:55, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • Congratulations, you got it. AwesomeBoy (contact) 01:16, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • I do want to say yes but I feel like you haven't been the most active of users lately, especially if you're applying for a higher staff role. I would say yes if it wasn't for this because I do believe you have the ability to be an administrator, so I'm just going to remain neutral. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 10:56, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
  • I do say that you'd be a good Admin. You meet the standards for it. You deserve it. Just don't become to inactive, since Myth Hunter was demoted for that. Fear The Thunder (Enter Thunderland)
  • You meet minimum and general you are right for it. - Mantiix
  • Same as Ali and taskfocre141yuri. -User:TheGlitch01
  • You do meet the edit requirements, but I think you need to improve on your activity before you can be promoted. Boomer8 (talk) 20:45, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
  • I feel like you're compentent enough to be promoted, the only thing that's a problem is your activity, work on that, but everything else is near-perfect, good going man! MattMythMaestro 10:45, April 28 (UTC)
  • Why is this not closed yet. Myth hunting master

Myth hunter - Demotion

Closed as successful by LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 09:51, April 8, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, you heard that right. Myth hunter has proved his neglency towards MW a lot (check his GTA Wiki contribution). He also left with the excuse of his exams lasting till the Mid-February, which was acceptable. But look where we are now, 5-6 months and no sign. MythHunter2013 also had the inactive time period of that many months as well and got demoted, I don't see why Myth hunter won't get demoted either. Seeing that some Bcrats are less strict in staff duty matters (opinion, not an insult or anything), I am putting this req up so that the community can get him demoted or maybe not. As you know the cliches, decision is up to you. AwesomeBoy (contact) 04:27, April 07, 2016 (UTC)

Votes

Comments

  • Am I eligible to vote? If so, let me know, I know what I'll vote. Mr. Ferrari (talk) 10:36, April 7, 2016 (UTC)
  • The same thing is going on at GTA Wiki simply because inactive staff members are taking up space where someone else could be more active in. He shouldn't be any staff position if he can't manage time. Mr. Ferrari (talk) 10:58, April 7, 2016 (UTC)
  • I don't think he is anwful admin, but if he is inactive. That's the choice. Mantiix, 15:49, April 7, 2016 (UTC).
  • He would be a good Admin if he spent at least 2 or 3 days a week on here, But due to the evidence provided, he should be demoted. Fear The Thunder 21:19, April 7, 2016 (UTC)
  • First of all, he is not an awful admin so I don't want to hear any more mudslinging or personal attacks on his character. He has been with the GTA MW for a long time, and has JUST been moved to inactive staff yesterday. The reason why we have that section on the staff page is to give staffers who have lost interest in the wiki a chance to come back into activity, or to resign. If neither of that happens and a couple months go by then the user is to be demoted as a last result. I'm not condoning inactivity, but because he has just been moved to inactive staff, I think the respectable thing to do would to give him some time to decide what he wants to do. Boomer8 (talk) 23:11, April 7, 2016 (UTC)
  • Same as Boomer.--007MH MythHunter 007 Talk 007MH 04:19, April 8, 2016 (UTC)
  • I see Boomer's point of giving MH due process in hopes of him returning but he has been very inactive. MH is a great user and this doesn't change that. If he returns he can apply for Patroller or Admin. BTW, even if MH is demoted we don't need to rush into promoting a new admin. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 05:08, April 8, 2016 (UTC)

MattMythMaestro - Patroller

Closed as successful by LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 09:55, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I am Matt, as most of you know by now, I am going to run for a second time being Patroller, since well my break from here, I just needed to sort some things out.

I feel as if I did do a great deal with my patrolling, but the case was the social went wrong, I've improved on that since of now, and re-justified my wrongs and paying my sorry's to those effected.

Now I am not writing this up and expecting anything great, because I do acknowledge my wrong-doings, but I do please wish for a clean slate, since some of my friends have eagered me into applying once again.

I am sure I meet the criteria and can help in many ways as I did when I was first applied, thanks for your time, just leave a simple Yes or No, and a comment why you have put it.

- MattMythMaestro

Votes

Comments

  • Matt, you've changed a lot, you've become the same good old Matt, I once knew when I came back. It's a blessing in disguise. Having you back as a patroller would be amazing, just like good old times. I wish you all the luck and to speak the truth you don't need it, you've the tools to make it to the top and I know, you'll reach it someday. --Ghost pixel 1 by zombiepattyfag-d9c9wvwAli Rocky: VC Myth Hunter 14:46, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
  • Don't even resign again xD You're brilliant <3 It'd be great to see you back in the staff. Mr. Ferrari (talk) 15:36, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
  • There was a lot of pot stirring last time you were here, but I am a fair guy and I've seen your editing capabilities and commitment to the wiki. I'll say yes to this request, but I don't want to see any more drama coming from you. Don't make me regret this. Boomer8 (talk) 18:09, April 2, 2016 (UTC)
  • Same as Guy A. junior.--007MH MythHunter 007 Talk 007MH 04:48, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • Great user. Would be a good patroller. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 05:52, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Myth hunting master - Patroller

Closed as successful by LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 12:00, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

I am applying for Patroller. I have been perfecting my grammar, posts, and more. I have been thinking about doing this for a while and have decided to see what happens (I know I will lose) but still, I am willing to take the risk. Fear The Thunder

Votes

Comments

  • You meet all the minimum requirements for Patroller. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 11:42, March 26, 2016 (UTC)
  • I voted "Neutral" because you're not ready yet. First of all your grammar is the most thing that hurts your chances of being a Patroller. And you are Pointsgaming just to get to the top of the leaderboard. Templates too. Improve all of that and it's a sure Yes from me. --SMG-20  SuperMythGangsta 11:49, March 26, 2016 (UTC)
    • What? I see hardly any problems with his grammar. If I'm honest, yours is no better. I think Myth hunting master is a good candidate, I agree with Tom. He has improvements to make, but don't we all? Good luck. Mr. Ferrari (talk)
  • You've been here for quite a time now and fit for the job, I see no complications whatsoever. --Ali Rocky: VC Myth Hunter 13:26, March 26, 2016 (UTC)
  • MHM and myself have had some disagreements recently, so I don't want to vote one way or another because it will be biased. However, I do have to say that MHM has a lot of pointsgaming problems (If you look at this contributions, he edited this request's comments about 8 times today... but I don't see any comments by him.) He has a lot of kinks to fix out, but those are simply things, but when he takes care of those I think he will be a good, active staff memeber. --Gunshow (T, E)
  • Same as Ali.--007MH MythHunter 007 Talk 007MH 06:29, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

Demotion - Mantiix

Issue resolved. The user will not be demoted. - Boomer8 (talk) 18:36, February 11, 2016 (UTC)

Mantiix has been blocked for 1 day for vandalising a users talk page in retaliation to the recent events that have been happening. It is now being brought forward that he should also be demoted. Before voting, please consider these points:

  1. Mantiix also went onto the GTA Wiki and vandalised several pages. This shows his immaturity and childishness, two things staff members should not have, especially in situations like these.
  2. Mantiix was actually not promoted based on skill, but mainly on his 500 edits (which he was around at the time). It should be noted that most of these edits were gained via Comment Sherlocking.

Feel free to agree or disagree as you feel. Voting will be closed when the majority of users have voted.

Do take a look at this: Mantiix's Apology

Votes

Comments

  • I feel he is too immature for a staff place. Staff members need to have a strong mindset when situations like this occur and I don't feel he has shown he has one by vandalising user pages on both this wiki and GTA Wiki, and by vandalising other pages on the GTA Wiki also. I am not voting for this just because he attacked the GTA Wiki, but because of what this shows about him and his mentality. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 18:18, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Vault is taking this as a revenge from the GTA Wiki, it's obvious, now don't start arguing on this page.--Ali Rocky (talk) 18:22, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm pretty sure that I just said I am not doing it because it is the GTA Wiki. Even Boomer said that he thinks he is too immature. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 18:23, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
    • I really lost my trust in you, since you didn't stood up for me on the GTA Wiki even though I didn't do anything. And you are constantly asking for justice for that melodrama queen Monk.--Ali Rocky (talk) 20:53, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • In light of recent events, Mantix has shown that he is too immature for his staff position. Vandalizing pages on the GTA Wiki and now vandalizing a user's profile on this wiki demonstrates the numerous rules he has broken. I suggest everyone voting not to be biased because he is your friend but to vote for the good of the community as someone who does this is dangerous to have as a staff member. Perhaps he can reapply for his position back in the future when he has matured. Boomer8 (talk) 18:34, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Boomer, this is a different wiki, It dosent tie with this one. - Boomer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperMythGangsta (talkcontribs) 18:36, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes, but he also vandalized a user's profile on this one. And when I said that quote I meant not blocking him because it occurred on the GTA Wiki. I never said anything about demotion. Boomer8 (talk) 18:44, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Good day, I am a Staff member on the GTA Wiki. Please allow me to express my view on this matter. I am not entirely up to date with all the incidences that have been happening, but from what I hear some users were exhibiting homophobia towards this user. Like I said, I do not have all the details on the matter, but if a Staff member has been homophobic towards the aforementioned user, I would not personally regard them as a good candidate for a Staff member. TAlim 1994 - Konan T-A Lim (talk | contributions) 19:10, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
    • @Talim As our B'crat stated that he is put up for demotion for different reasons, this isn't about the GTA Wiki, we don't deal with their issues.--Ali Rocky (talk) 20:53, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
      • Apparently the homophobic remarks were occurring on this wiki. Also, I have a Friendship with the aforementioned user, though I do not let that influence my opinion. TAlim 1994 - Konan T-A Lim (talk | contributions) 19:49, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
      • Your friend Ferrari loves Matt even though he is Homophobic, but who am I talking to? Talking to the GTA Wiki users is like shouting at a wall. Please don't reply me back, just leave it. --Ali Rocky (talk) 20:53, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
        • Maybe he didn't know he was homophobic, since he wasn't even a Wikia user when he edited Super's user page. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 19:58, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
        • He did that when he was staff and he did it twice with Super, once on his profile and once on the chat, Boomer knows it, Matt is a big drama queen and so is Monk. --Ali Rocky (talk) 20:53, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • A few things need to be addressed: Mantix is not perfect and did make a mistake and did stupid things. He has never been in trouble before and I think a warning in addition to his block is sufficient punishment. Also on CNB Jim a known vandal is being considered to be allowed back to edit. Mantix has apologized (even though it is ridiculous) just like Matt apologized. We should give him a chance, and if he does something stupid like this again he might as well resign before a demotion is filed. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 03:51, February 10, 2016 (UTC)
  • I dont know what happen ,but if you really didn't not mean it,please change and I hope you for the best. --User:Taskforce141yuri (User talk:Taskforce141yuri) 18:54, February 10,2016 (UTC)
  • I also think Mantiix deserves a promotion only when he proves he deserves it, not only cause of his edit count. Think maturely guys, not edit-wise. AwesomeBoy (contact) 10:22, February 10, 2016 (UTC)


Request closed as Successful. - Boomer8 (talk) 19:09, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

SuperMythGangsta - Patroller

Hi users, I'm SuperMythGangsta. I'm applying for the Patroller, the 6th Time. I hope this time It would achieve its sole objective. Anyways I was active here for a month, as advised by some fellow friends. I utilized this month to my full strength, I have even improvised my grammar, worked some theories, dedicated a wiki for editors. I did a lot of work regarding the recent vandal threat. Thank you for taking your time to read this.

Votes

Comments

  • You have improved your grammar from a vast extent. It's a clear yes from me. --AwesomeBoy (contact) 15:27, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • I have ne'er seen a user so resolute. A lacklustre user would've abandoned this aspiration after 5 vile applications. Old friend, you truly remind me of King Bruce's undaunted Spider. --Ali Rocky (talk) 15:41, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Yeah, you look great for a patroller. Here is my vote too. - Mantiix (talk) 18:34, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Your grammar has improved so I feel inclined to say yes, but if you do get promoted, we need to be seeing you actually using your abilities to combat vandalism. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 19:31, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Another Patroller with good skills is always welcomed. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 08:23, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • I changed my vote to a 'Yes', I am willing to have you as a Patroller with me, but when the time comes, you should learn to use the abilities and rights as a Patroller, and not just so you can kick and ban people from the chat, good luck. - MattMythMaestro (Message) 02:44, February 7, 2016 (UTC)


Issue resolved. The user will not be demoted. - Boomer8 (talk) 07:26, January 30, 2016 (UTC)

MattMythMaestro - Demotion

MATT1
In recent events, a patroller on this wiki - Matt - was involved in an argument on the chat with another user on the wiki; XXDrewTheDewXx. I wouldn't normally put a staff member up for demotion for a simple argument, but apparently Matt became completely uncivil towards him and attacked Drew's religious beliefs. This is completely unacceptable behavior from any user on this wiki; let alone a staff member. After the assault, he childishly attacked Ali Rocky and others who disapproved of his actions. I understand some of you consider this user as a friend, but when someone's religious beliefs are offended - by a staff member - you have to look past that and for the good of the wiki. Staffers are to uphold the Policy, and when a patroller gets way out of line like this, it makes the entire staff look bad. Boomer8 (talk) 12:27, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Read this before you vote: Matt promised that he won't cause any disruption, let alone arguments.

Votes

Comments

  • Changed My Mind.. - Super
  • I personally am an athiest myself, but I don't go around disrespecting people's beliefs because I don't agree with them. He has been blocked for incivilty in the past, so I don't think he deserves the rights. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 12:44, January 24, 2016 (UTC)
  • Same as Vaultboy. Myth(Please leave your threats here/Wanna Stalk?) 18:59, January 24, 2016 (UTC)
  • Matt is a great user who got into an argument that may have went too far. It's never a good idea to bring up religion (or politics) as people usually have differing views and that leads to arguments and turmoil. If Matt apologized to User:Drew and acknowledges his part in the matter I think we could all put this matter behind us. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 04:17, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • To all concerned and mainly to you XXDrewTheDewXx, I apologize for my actions that lead up to this event, I never wanted a simple conversation that would turn into harassment or going against your beliefs, I want to make it clear, I do not have hatred towards Christians or any Religion, everyone's beliefs should be accepted and well nutured, I also want to apologize to the staff who have had to deal with this espcially you Boomer, I know as a part of the staff I should not be condoning and doing such, I am upset with myself that it took me that far and I couldn't realize what was at stake, and Drew, I hope I didn't hurt you in anyway, if I did, I am gratefully sorry, and I do not condone my actions, the block was correct and I am ashamed to have let such words be provoked. - MattMythMaestro (Message) 04:46, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • I originally said yes, but after Matt's apology and accepting and acknowledging his wrongdoing I think should stay on as Patroller. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 05:04, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • After the apology from Matt, I think we can give him a second chance. I hope he will not do it in future. Myth(Please leave your threats here/Wanna Stalk?) 05:53, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • I am giving no, but for a reason, which is, if you do something like this without keeping in mind of your past deeds, you'll be demoted instantly. --AwesomeBoy (contact) 08:09, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • I would be insulted if somebody insults my religion and my beliefs, but good thing is that Matt apologized. I hope that something like this will never happen in future. - Death002 (talk) 12:21, January 25, 2016 (UTC).
  • Same as Sasquatch. - MH 007
  • I appreciate that you have realized your mistake, and have done the honorable thing by apologizing. I am changing my vote to "no" to give you another chance, but I hope I don't regret it in the future. I didn't want to string you up in front of the community like this, but when someone goes as far as assaulting one other's religion, a demotion request is necessary. Stick to your apology and don't do anything like this again. Boomer8 (talk) 22:52, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you all for giving me this chance, I will not disobey and fall under the train like I just did, sorry for the time I had to waste. - MattMythMaestro (Message) 03:16, January 26, 2016 (UTC)
  • Even if it's already over, you will not be demoted, I will simple leave my opinion and vote anyways. By the way, you act very strange to me. It's like dislike and like at the same time. I don't care now, everyone voted No, you will not be demoted which is good for you. - Mantiix


Closed as unsuccessful by --MH007 (<span style="color:white>Talk) 05:24, January 3, 2016 (UTC)

Myth hunting master-Patroller

I am applying for Patroller for the first time. I have improved my grammar as told by my friends on here. I am Hoping for a Patroller position. I have improved most things I have been told to improve, e.g. how I edit. So far I have improved.

Votes

Comments

  • Did you even read the requirements for the patroller. You have be active for at least two months and you must have over 500 edits.--MH007 (<span style="color:white>Talk)
  • All I have seen you do in the last couple of days is edit in very small wording and sentences, you were clearly pointsgaining which is against the rules, but, I am not too worried about that, you must reach the requirements for the position, currently you haven't, so thats why I am giving you a "No" - MattMythMaestro (Message) 18:52, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

SuperMythGangsta - Patroller

Closed as unsuccessful by LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 17:07, January 2, 2016 (UTC) Hello Users, im SMG,i have been tried to apply for like 4 or 5 times for a patroller and it turned out that all of them were not successful,most of the problems were: Grammar,Arguments,Edits.And now i finished them all, i posted some theories about the UFOs in GTA 5 and i didin't got in any argument,i wasn't active cuz i had some problems with computer and well i had to go to school so yeah.Vote.Also i wish you a happy NEW YEAR

Votes

Comments

  • After a long think, and observation on other people's thoughts I have come to the decision to give you a no on this one Super, but make sure you put in the effort and just don't stay for one week and edit a few pages then apply, you got to really put effort it to get the results! - MattMythMaestro (Message) 19:15 January 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • I can't say much but you are a veteran at myths wiki, you know about the wiki rules, and can revert edits, but I don't think you'll ever be promoted to admin, if you keep up with this state of grammar, anyways hard work eradicates the impossible, remember that.--Ali Rocky (talk) 22:35, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
  • Your grammar still isn't good enough in my eyes, although it is better. I also haven't seen you do anything that proves to me you have the ability to be a Patroller and be able to use the rights where needed. You are also prone to long periods of inactivity. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 20:26, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yeah i had some periods because of my computer -Super
  • You need to work in your grammar. Grammar Policy must be followed by all users in this wiki, especially staff members. - Matthew103 (talk) 04:35, January 1, 2016 (UTC)
  • Your daily routine - EAT SLEEP APPLY FOR STAFF DISAPPEAR REPEAT.--MH007
  • "Yeah i had some periods because of my computer" made my day! Damn, you totally, unintentionally made my day! Best quote of the wiki. Anyways, your grammar is good, I've seen far more worse requests than that. But then again, can't say Yes cause your work is yet to begin. AwesomeBoy (contact) 11:25, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Ali Rocky - Administrator

Closed as successful by LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 20:28, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Hey guys, I am Ali Rocky, an ardent Vice City myth hunter. I have had two patroller stints, the initial session was assaulted by an infamous user. My subsequent run as a patroller, has been quite thriving and persuasive, such is the claim of copious users. I have exerted myself to the cause of revealing occult and undisclosed myths in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. I aim to deliver a lot to this wiki, exerting my utmost potential. I have faith that the community will vote for the optimal. Thank you and may Allah bless you all. --Ali Rocky (talk) 08:58, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Votes

Comments

  • It has to be yes from me. I know you very well, and you are a very nice person, because you don't abuse and don't start fights anymore, as before. Now you changed. And I'm not that person who likes living in past, so now is now. You are sufficient for an admin, you are old enough, you are good editor and you are active person. Keep it going, and don't leave this page. You are influential person to me and this whole wiki. - User:Mantiix (talk) 11:00, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I would say yes, since you have shown at points ability to become an administrator, but as Matt said, your social skills could use a bit of work because we don't want arguments upon our ranks. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 11:06, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same as Matt.--MH007 (<span style="color:white>Talk) 11:13, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • im seeing that the whole No thing is being biased just because everyone is agreeing with Matt's reason and not giving their own reason. At least I know Hunter and if possible Matthew will do the right decision. AwesomeBoy (contact) 12:35, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I can agree with some part of what Matt said. You arent too great at not being arguments. But as he himself said your editing skills are great and you have put a very large amount of hardwork in the wiki. With the hardwork you put in wiki and how much you care about wiki makes me feel its unfair to say no. Myth(Please leave your threats here/Wanna Stalk?) 15:47, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I changed my decision based on what I have seen when I have looked back at what you have been doing these past months and I think despite the arguments you have had, you definitely have the skills necessary to be an administrator and I feel you'll make a fine one at that. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 19:10, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I think you have the qualifications for an admin position given the amount of edits and time you have put into the wiki. You have improved your attitude in the past months, and I believe you have the maturity for the job. Boomer8 (talk) 19:42, December 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I agree with Matt that you aren't good at socializing with people, but I know that you can change that. I know that you've done well in this wiki so I think you need to be promoted, as long as you socialize with people better to prevent arguments and fights. - Matthew103 (talk) 09:52, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

LS11sVaultBoy - Bureaucrat

Closed December 29, 2015 as Successful. Boomer8 (talk) 02:19, December 30, 2015 (UTC) Hey, I'm VaultBoy and I'm running for bureaucrat (again) today since I've done a lot lately, but also because it is my third anniversary of being here. The last time I applied for bureaucrat I was told that if I showed, and I'm paraphrasing here, that I was passionate about the wiki then I would have a much greater chance of achieving bureaucracy. Therefore, I have spent the last few months editing like crazy to make the wiki look better and just generally do anything I can. I have added numerous new templates, as are now seen on most pages, which are mainly to make the structure and design of the wiki look better. I also have been, and had been before, spending large amounts of my own personal time (how I do it, it takes a while) making the badges system as customized and "cool" as they can be. I then obviously became the first user to reach 5000 on this badges system, but mainly I became the first user in the wiki's history to reach 5000 edits, which is something I am VERY proud of. Another two things that must certainly show I am passionate about the wiki are the facts that I have been here for 3 years now, but also because I managed to get onto the Hall of Fame, along with Sasquatch and Boomer, which surely shows I have done something right.

If I were to become a bureaucrat on the wiki, there would then be three. This is only a good thing because it means that not only will bureaucrat-only decisions be easier with no decisions stuck ending at "yes and no", but I feel that with me on the team it will have all necessary skills to run a myths wiki in full charge of the wiki; Sasquatch is the myths bureau, Boomer is the enforcer of the policy (as said on the HoF), and I would be the one who is all about the structure and organization of the wiki, as I have started to be these past few months.

Finally, I would like to end on the point that I have changed MASSIVELY over the past year, let alone years. We have all made mistakes in the past, but hopefully you guys have noticed that I have changed over time and I have even got from not really liking many users, to having full respect and a liking for them and what they do for the wiki, Ali being a prime example of this. I feel I have now gained the respect of this new community since the "community cleansing" of August 2014 and what I did I feel should be forgotten about and left in the past, because the past is all it is now.

Thank you, and I hope you make the right decision.

NOTE: ONLY BUREAUCRATS CAN VOTE, OTHER STAFF AND NORMAL USERS CAN ONLY COMMENT

Votes

Comments

  • Sorry I haven't been active lately I've been incredibly busy. For me it's a resounding YES. I have absolute faith and trust in Vaultboy that he should be the third Bureaucrat of GTA Myths Wiki. Vaultboy has all the skills and know-how on managing and running a wiki and I trust his judgment.

Boomer, I strongly recommend you vote (it must be unanimous) in favor of promoting Vaultboy as he has proven himself to be a great editor and moreover is a trustworthy, honest person. The past is the past and we all must embrace the present and the future as I believe you me and Vaultboy would be the perfect team to run the best myths site on the web. --Sasquatch101 (talk) 04:53, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

  • You are in great contention to be Bureaucrat, the work you do here is phenomenal, what ever has happened in the past, is the Past, I have the most respect and belief towards you that you will do a great job, and I hope you do in fact become a Bureaucrat, best of luck! - MattMythMaestro (Message) 07:46, December 29, 2015 (UTC)
  • Vaultboy, it has been a pleasure having you on this wiki. I have seen the time and effort you have put in these past few years, and it is absolutely outstanding. You have definitely grown through the experiences and hardships this wiki has endured, and I now believe you are 100% qualified for the job. I also think it is a good idea to have a third Bureaucrat in case of making decisions and managing the wiki, but also for rewarding someone who has earned the position. I look forward to working with you in the new year and in the future as a co-bureaucrat. Boomer8 (talk) 02:19, December 30, 2015 (UTC)


Mantiix- Patroller

Closed December 26, 2015 as Successful. Boomer8 (talk) 21:56, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Greetings, I am Mantiix. I possess a deep inclination towards staff. I am a voracious analyst and prodigious theorist. I desire to be admitted into this respected armed body. I have a few editing errors but I'll recover from such editing flaws. I want to shield the wiki from undesirable, corrupt and diabolical vandalism. All in all, I will surely be disheartened and dismayed if I fail to make it but my enthusiasm won't be daunted. Hoping positively. God Bless. --Mantiix (talk) 20:14, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

Votes

Comments

  • You are the most deserving candidate for a patroller. You have a professional touch in your grammar, I like it. You meet all the requirements and vow to even improve your flaws, I don't see any problem at all in having you promoted. Good luck for your future. --Ali Rocky (talk) 20:43, December 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't believe you are qualified enough. Over half of your edits are just going on comment sections and forum posts saying random things to get your edit count up. Also, edits that you do make to pages aren't really that good, as they are usually just changing a word and they end up just getting reverted by myself and Boomer. For this reason it is a no from me, but keep working and trying to improve and I'm sure you'll be able to reach a position eventually, ask Ali to help you, as I told him the exact same thing and now he is flying fine. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 21:50, December 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • I think that you could be patroller, your grammar is good enough and you could improve couple things. Good luck! User:Death002 (talk) 23:47, December 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Can't be sure if you are writing in such a way just to impress us or whateves, but meh. I'm digging it. Yes from me mister, cause if you did comments big enough, then I don't think that matters. But if your comments are small, way small, then I agree with Vault. AwesomeBoy (contact) 09:22, December 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • You will be good a patroller,I have faith on you and like Ali said your grammar is good which is one of the reason I vote you,again good luck.'User:Taskforce141yuri(contact) 21:45,December 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Like Vault said, most of your edits are just comments, and I spent easily 40 minutes yesterday reverting the pages you edit. If you improve your grammar and make more substantial edits I'd feel better promoting you. Boomer8 (talk) 21:07, December 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same as VaultBoy.--MythHunter 007 04:29, December 25, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same as Boomer, for the comments and edits you make are unnecessary. MattMythMaestro (Message) 03:53, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same as Rocky.


Death002 - Patroller

Closed as successful AwesomeBoy (contact) 09:53, December 26, 2015 (UTC) Hello everyone, Im Death002 and since joining this wikia I wanted to become a Patroller. I meet all the criteria for this position (I have 514 edits, and no blocks whatsoever). I don't have problems with my grammar, and Im here nearly every day. I think that I could make this wikia better place, protect it from trolls and vandals.

Thanks for reading.

Votes


Comments

  • You and Mantiix are the foremost choices for patrollers, hopefully he will leave a request soon. And as for you, I am so happy :) May Allah Bless you with even more.--Ali Rocky (talk) 18:43, December 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • You do meet the requirements to be a patroller, but I looked at your contributions and most of the recent ones are just writing comments. Most of the edits you do on articles are usually good, so I guess you're qualified enough to get promoted. Boomer8 (talk) 19:01, December 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same reasons and thoughts as Boomer. LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 21:50, December 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Been seeing you editing a lot recently, keep up the good work! AwesomeBoy (contact) 02:28, December 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same as Boomer.--MythHunter 007 03:44, December 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Same as Ali Rockey.'User:Taskforce141yuri(contact) 21:51,December 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • You would be a great addition to the staff, I wish you the best of luck! - MattMythMaestro (Message) 4:01, December 26, 2015 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.